Deadline Extended! CFP: “Margaret Fuller, Women of the Nineteenth Century, and Revolution”  

The Margaret Fuller Society is pleased to sponsor a panel at the upcoming Thoreau Society Annual Gathering in Concord, MA, July 9-13, 2025. The overall theme of the conference, in honor of the 350th anniversary of the battle of Lexington and Concord, is “Revolution,” an especially apt context for exploring Fuller’s life and work. Papers might focus on her rhetoric of the American and French revolutions in Woman in the Nineteenth Century, her choice of heroines from history relevant to revolutionary progress, or her address to national questions of race and slavery alongside gender.  Her dispatches for the New York Tribune might be explored as they actually take readers to the scene of revolution and its defeat in Rome, and as she interprets the new order and the “next revolution” for both Europe and America, while her personal correspondence hints at the personal or sexual revolution in her own life. 

We also invite paper proposals that draw comparisons between Margaret Fuller and other women writers and movements, or other Transcendentalists. Early and independent scholars of Fuller are welcome to propose their work as well as those more seasoned. Please submit a 300-word abstract and brief curriculum vitae to Christina Katopodis (katopodis [dot] christina [at] gmail [dot] com) with subject line “MFS 2025 AG Proposal” by December 31.

Note: Dec 31 is the extended deadline. The original deadline was Dec 15.

An Updated Bibliography of Scholarship on Margaret Fuller by Alice de Galzain

This post was written by contributing author, Dr. Alice de Galzain.

Ten years ago, in a review of Megan Marshall’s Margaret Fuller: A New American Life (2013) and John Matteson’s The Lives of Margaret Fuller: A Biography (2012), Fritz Fleischmann asked the following question: “why is [Margaret Fuller] still so little known?” (275). While welcoming the publication of these two phenomenal biographies, he regretted that “[t]here is no Margaret Fuller Memorial, no museum, no national holiday, not even a postage stamp” (275). Strictly speaking, Fuller’s cenotaph at Mount Auburn Cemetery can be considered a memorial and there was also a memorial pavilion put up on Fire Island in the early twentieth century that lasted about a decade, until a storm swept it away.[1] However, the kind of reverence that has always characterized the public reception of Ralph Waldo Emerson’s and Henry David Thoreau’s works—which is what I think Fleischmann is alluding to—has not been there for Fuller, whose name was rescued from oblivion by an amazing group of scholars in the 1970s and 80s.

In 2024, things are looking quite different. The recent updates to the Margaret Fuller Society online bibliography [now publicly available to view and download below and on our resources page] reflect the dynamic state Fuller studies are in today, showing that a tremendously vast amount of scholarly work has been produced on Fuller in recent years. It is a really exciting time for Fuller studies! In 2025, a Library of America edition of Fuller’s writings, edited by Noelle A. Baker, Megan Marshall, and Brigitte Bailey, will be published, and, in the years to follow, the Edinburgh Edition of the Collected Writings of Margaret Fuller, edited by Leslie E. Eckel, Sonia Di Loreto, and Andrew Taylor, will also come out. Symbolically very important, these two editions mark a crucial milestone in terms of the accessibility of Fuller’s writings.

In “A Short Essay on Critics,” Fuller defined the role of the “critic” as follows:

we feel the need of a criterion, of a standard; and then we say what the work is not, as well as what it is . . . . We do not seek to degrade but to classify an object by stating what it is not. We detach the part from the whole, lest it stand between us and the whole. When we have ascertained in what degree it manifests the whole, we may safely restore it to its place, and love or admire it there ever after. (8)

The body of critical work listed in the Fuller Society online bibliography—journal articles, monographs, edited collections, and dissertations—sheds light on the glories and limitations of Fuller’s work—on “what it is” and “what it is not.” It shows that, now more than ever, new perspectives are entering Fuller studies—queer, ecofeminist, decolonial, and pedagogical perspectives. The bibliography, which features works in English and other languages (a beautiful reflection of Fuller’s cosmopolitanism) and which we will continue to update, seeks to help graduate students, scholars, and members of the general public alike easily navigate and understand the current—and past—state of Fuller studies.

Works Cited

Fleischmann, Fritz. “Reading Margaret Fuller.” Resources for American Literary Study, vol. 37, 2014, pp. 275-88.

Fuller, Margaret. “A Short Essay on Critics.” Dial, vol. 1, no. 1, 1840, pp. 5-11.


[1]  I owe these two remarks to Megan Marshall, who kindly reminded me of Fuller’s two memorials in an e-mail.

Spotlight: Eagan Dean, MFS Board Member and Committee for Racial Justice

This year the Margaret Fuller Society (MFS) is spending time getting to know its leaders and members who live all over the world. This month we honor the work of MFS Board Member and Racial Justice Committee Member Dr. Eagan Dean, who is a Postdoctoral Research Fellow with the Clayman Institute for Gender Research at Stanford University.

Q: What might MFS members ask you about?

A: Trans studies, finishing your dissertation, Fuller family materials at Harvard, book history, publishing in Scholarly Editing.

Q: What’s something about Fuller that you find inspiring?

A: I’m inspired by her creative thought about gender and by her tenacity. She knew her ideas about gender nonconformity in particular were not well received and her scholarly style was often derided, especially by male peers. This did not deter her. I admire her commitment to her own research insights in the the face of skepticism. My favorite quote is about encouraging gender nonconforming people to thrive in whatever life brings them joy, especially for young women. She writes, “Fourier had observed…one third of women as likely to have a taste for masculine pursuits, one third of men for feminine…no need to clip the wings of any bird that wants to soar and sing, or finds in itself the strength of pinion for a migratory flight unusual to its kind.”

Q: What would you like to see the MFS accomplish in the next five years?

In the next five years I would love to see MFS build on its success with the social service award to continue developing relationships with organizations and scholars focused on racial justice. Perhaps we might take a page from Fuller’s critiques of American prison to build connections with abolitionist thinkers and organizers. I am so proud to be part of an author’s society that is invested in our author’s living legacy in the world, not only as a literary figure but also as an engaged critic of social wrongs. 

Q: What is one thing you’ve learned or accomplished in the last year?

A: I am very proud of defending my dissertation! I’m excited to have the time and space to think about the wider conversations I can join in the book version of the project.

Q: Where could Fuller Society members go to learn more about your writing and research?

A: Fuller is very core to my work. For more on trans studies, I recommend “Androgyny and Desire.” For more book history, I recommend ““Woman in the Nineteenth Century and the Politics of Reprinting.”

“Androgyny and Desire: Margaret Fuller, Julia Ward Howe, and Fractured Trans Archives.” Legacy: A Journal of American Women Writers, vol. 40 no. 1, 2023, p. 59-84.

“Woman in the Nineteenth Century and the Politics of Reprinting, 1845-1980.” ESQ 69.1 (2022): 39-72.

Eagan Dean (they/he) is a scholar of American cultural and literary history. He is currently a Postdoctoral research fellow with the Clayman Institute for Gender Research at Stanford University and serves as co-editor of the “Essays” section in Scholarly Editing. Their research uses archival and literary analysis to understand the origins of contemporary beliefs about gender and transgender life. His work argues that current conversations about transgender experience are inseparably intertwined with the ideologies of race, colonialism, and misogyny which shaped the early U.S. Eagan Dean is completing his book manuscript, Inventing American Gender: Nineteenth Century American Literary Gender and its Uses. The monograph demonstrates that historical U.S. texts produced gender identities anew as rhetorical tools and used these tools to advance the political investments of their authors pertaining to racial and colonial power. 

Prior to joining the Clayman Institute, Dean completed a PhD in Literatures in English with a certificate in Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies at Rutgers University – New Brunswick. At Rutgers, he won several teaching awards and essay prizes, including the Excellence in Leadership and Teaching Award. This award recognized his development of new trans history curricula and work with community nonprofits. 

MFS Spotlight: MFS Board Member Etta Madden

This year the Margaret Fuller Society (MFS) is spending time getting to know its leaders and members who live all over the world. This month we honor the work of MFS Board Member and Racial Justice Committee Member Dr. Etta Madden, who is Professor of English, Emerita, at Missouri State University.

Q: What might MFS members ask you about?

A: Fuller Society members might ask me about 19th-century US women in Italy; US “utopian” and intentional communities and literature; cookbooks and foodways; knitting; and swimming.

Q: What’s something about Fuller that you find inspiring?

A: I fell in love with Fuller because of her writing about gender fluidity in Woman in the Nineteenth Century. However, as I read more of her writing and about her life, I came to admire the arc of her development—i.e. what she would call “the unfolding of her life from within”—but what we all know also was influenced by external forces, such as relationships with family and friends. I have been especially moved by how she was changed by her teaching experiences and her editorial experiences in New England; her time as a news writer in New York; and her dramatic personal changes as she traveled abroad in Europe.

It’s probably not surprising, then, that among my favorites of Fuller’s writings are her comments on “the American in Europe,” from one of her undated dispatches to the Tribune. Her delineation of three types of Americans—”the servile,” “the conceited,” and “the thinking American”—still ring true today as we consider why and how many people from the US travel. The first goes “abroad to spend his money and indulge his tastes;” the second “declares he thought it was all humbug before he came, and now he knows it;” and the third “wishes to gather and carry back with him all that will bear a new culture and a new climate.”  Fuller’s experiences in Rome’s Church of San Luigi (dei Francesi) with the San Domenichino frescoes of Santa Cecilia’s life—so understated in her dispatch of December 30, 1847—embody the “thinking American.” She is changed by what she learns of the noblewoman, Santa Cecilia, who cared deeply for the needy masses. These frescoes, rather than the famous Caravaggio paintings of biblical scenes, move her.

Q: What would you like to see the MFS accomplish in the next five years?

I am delighted to have come on board during the discussions of a “journaling for justice” conference. I’m hopeful that the planning for a conference celebrating women in international journalism will come to fruition in 2026—possibly in Italy!

Q: What is one thing you’ve learned or accomplished in the last year?

I organized and co-led a small group trip to Italy, following in the footsteps of nineteenth-century writer Constance Fenimore Woolson. It was such a treat leading a phenomenal group of “Woolites” with biographer Anne Boyd Rioux. I especially liked that it allowed me tap into my knowledge of US women writers in Italy (including Fuller, of course) as well as Elizabeth Barrett Browning.

Etta Madden is Professor of English, Emerita, at Missouri State University. She will be a visiting professor at the University of Pisa, Italy, Fall 2024, and has been a visiting scholar at the American Academy in Rome, a Fulbright Senior Lecturer in American Literature at the Università degli Studi di Catania (Italy), and a recipient of research fellowships at the New York Public Library and the Library Company of Philadelphia. Her books include Engaging Italy: American Women’s Utopian Visions and Transnational Networks (SUNY Press 2022), Eating in Eden: Food & American Utopias (U Nebraska 2006) and Bodies of Life: Shaker Literature and Literacies (Greenwood 1998).

Below is a brief bibliography of possible interest to MFS members to get to know Dr. Madden’s writing and research:

Engaging Italy: American Women’s Utopian Visions and Transnational Networks. SUNY Press (April 2022 cloth; October 2022 e-book and paper).

Selections from Eliza Leslie. Ed., Intro. & Bibliography. University of Nebraska Press, 2011.

“Soaring Above Zoar: Constance Fenimore Woolson’s Utopian Visions & Discourses.” In Eds. Kathleen Diffley, Caroline Gebhard and Cheryl Torsney. Secret Histories: A New Era of Constance Fenimore Woolson Scholarship. University of Georgia Press, Forthcoming 2024.

“Cultivation and Sustainability with Student Collaborators: Anne Hampton Brewster’s Philadelphia Evening Bulletin Letters from Rome, 1869-1870.” Legacy: A Journal of American Women Writers. 40.1-2 (2023). 223-32. With Alyssah Morrison.

“Writing Man and Nature (1864) in Italy: George and Caroline Marsh on Human-Environmental Relations.” Rivista italiana di filosofia politica. 4 (2023), 197-214.

“Travels, Translations and Limitations: Ambasciatrice Caroline Crane Marsh.” Transatlantica: American Studies Journal. Special issue on Transatlantic Women Writers. 2018.1.

“Anne Hampton Brewster’s St. Martin’s Summer and Utopian Literary Discourses.” Utopian Studies 28.2 (2017), 305-26.  

“Science in Catharine Maria Sedgwick’s Hope Leslie (1827).” Legacy: A Journal of American Women Writers 20 (2003) 1 & 2: 22-37.  Co-authored with Shelley R. Block.

Spotlight: MFS Board Member Kathy Lawrence

This year, the Margaret Fuller Society (MFS), once again, is spending time getting to know its leaders and members who live all over the world. This month we honor the work of Dr. Kathy Lawrence, who teaches at Georgetown University and is completing an edited volume of Henry James’s stories for the Cambridge University Press Complete Fiction of Henry James (forthcoming 2024), as well as a biography entitled Caroline Sturgis, Starlike Soul. To get to know Kathy, we asked her a few questions.

Q: What might MFS members ask you about?

A. I would like to tell MFS members about my travels in search of Fuller’s influence on three of her disciples: Caroline Sturgis, William Wetmore Story, and Henry James. Their discipleship was not imitative but rather individual, the fulfillment of their own vision for life, for she modeled how to be a seeker, not a follower. As a literary archivist, I have combed through repositories in London and Oxford, England, Paris, France, and Florence, Rome, and Venice, Italy. On our own continent, I have delved into libraries in Boston and Northampton, Massachusetts, New York, New York, Hanover, New Hampshire, Pasadena and Berkeley, California, Austin, Texas, and Charlottesville, Virginia. I have met the descendants and families of those artists. My wanderjahre has shown me the power of transmission, the presence of the unseen.

Q: What’s something about Fuller that you find inspiring?

A: What I admire about Fuller is her stoicism, a resilience and perseverance that inspired her three disciples (mentioned above) to live with their disabilities, both inherited and acquired, just as she had done. Like Fuller, Caroline Sturgis suffered, suffered terribly, and confronted severe losses, and she was ill for most of her life; yet she continued to write and paint, to raise her daughters to be artists, and to travel, as Fuller had encouraged her to do. William Wetmore Story was traumatized, running from New England and the humiliations he faced in Boston after his father Supreme CourtJustice Joseph Story was forced by his commitment to federalist principles to decide the infamous fugitive slave case Prigg vs. the State of Pennsylvania; yet, motivated by his attendance at Fuller’s only co-ed “Conversations,” he undertook to make a life in Rome and to become a successful sculptor. Henry James was lonely as a gay man in Victorian Boston; yet he pursued an arc of discovery that enabled him at long last to accept, indeed to celebrate, his identity, and to transmit it through his late fiction and non-fiction. He paid tribute to both Fuller and Sturgis near the end of his life in his memoir Notes of a Son and Brother (1914), a work that disclosed his queerness, his multiple disabilities and those of his family. In my recent article for the Henry James Review, I label this late style of James “the poetics of disclosure.”

Q: What would you like to see the MFS accomplish in the next five years?

A: An international conference in Italy!! Italy meant so much to Fuller and her work. It would be most appropriate for us to gather there.

Q: What is one thing you’ve learned or accomplished in the last year?

A: One thing I have learned in the past year is to meditate and to infuse every day with mindfulness. Fuller knew how to tap into this observation of direct experience, as shown in her autobiographical fragment, her poetry, and her letters. She was preternaturally aware, a core ability that bolstered her romanticism with realism.

After receiving her BA cum laude at Yale and her PhD at Boston University, in English and American Studies, respectively, Dr. Lawrence taught at George Washington University, Brandeis University, and is now at Georgetown University. In addition to her teaching, she is completing an edited volume of Henry James’s stories for the Cambridge University Press Complete Fiction of Henry James (forthcoming 2024), as well as a biography entitled Caroline Sturgis, Starlike Soul.

Below is a brief bibliography of possible interest to MFS members to get to know Dr. Lawrence’s writing and research:

“The ‘Dry-Lighted Soul’ Ignites: Emerson and His Soul-Mate Caroline Sturgis As Seen in Her Houghton Manuscripts.” Harvard Library Bulletin, Fall 2005, vol. 16, no. 3, 37-67.

“Soul Sisters and the Sister Arts: Margaret Fuller, Caroline Sturgis, and Their Private World of Love and Art.” ESQ: A Journal of the American Renaissance 54: 79-104.

“The Small Boy Was ‘Other’: Disability in James’s Fourth Phase.” The Henry James Review, Vol. 45, No. 1 (Winter 2024), pp. 47–71.

MFS at the 2024 Thoreau Society Annual Gathering

The Margaret Fuller Society sponsored a panel on “Margaret Fuller, Women in the 19C, and Resilience” at the Thoreau Society Gathering held in Concord, MA on Thursday, July 11, 2024. Read the full CFP here (opens in new tab). The panel, co-organized by MFS Past President Phyllis Cole and MFS Second Vice President Christina Katopodis, was very well-attended and followed by a robust, engaging discussion with the audience. The papers were as follows:

“The Body Resilient: Margaret Fuller’s Materialist Transcendentalism” by Johanna Pitetti-Heil

Johanna Pitetti-Heil is an American studies scholar with a specific research interest in literary studies and cultural theory, critical dance dance studies, feminist philosophy, and, most recently, transcendentalism. She is a (tenured) senior lecturer for gender and diversity studies at the English Department of the University of Cologne, Germany. She is co-editor of gender forum and she is a board member of SLSAeu. She is the author of Walking the Möbius Strip: An Inquiry into Knowing in Richard Powers Fiction (Winter, 2016), and her work in American literary and cultural studies, including critical dance studies, has appeared in journals such as Dance Chronicle, Hypatia, Amerikastudien / American Studies, WiN, the forum of J19, and in edited collections. She passed the Habilitation review process in 2024 and is currently preparing her second book manuscript “Becoming-Body: Practices of Freedom and Technologies of the Self in American Modern Dance.”

Johanna spoke about the linkage between materially real bodies (and body pains) and Fuller’s philosophy, reminding us that Fuller did not always put the soul over matter. She theorizes Fuller’s materialist transcendentalism, drawing from new materialism.

“Women Transcendentalists in the Publishing World: Margaret Fuller and Caroline Healey Dall’s Stories of Resilience” by Alice de Galzain

Alice de Galzain completed her PhD in English at the University of Edinburgh, where her dissertation focused on Ralph Waldo Emerson’s portrayal of Margaret Fuller in Memoirs of Margaret Fuller Ossoli (1852). She is about to begin a postdoc at Sorbonne University, working on “Women Networks and Transcendentalist Utopias: Health, Gender, and Reform.” Alice is the Associate Editor of The Concord Saunterer: A Journal of Thoreau Studies and the Associate Editor of Margaret Fuller, Periodical and Other Writings, 1834-1844, The Edinburgh Edition of the Collected Writings of Margaret Fuller. Her article on “Transcendentalist Women in Conversation: Margaret Fuller, Sophia Ripley, and ‘Woman’” appeared in Transatlantica: American Studies Journal in 2022, and she has two essays due to appear in Legacy and LIT: Literature Interpretation Theory later this year.

Alice spoke about how women’s overwork gets written into their sentences, notes their shortness, the integration of life and work writing in the same spaces. She spoke about the precarity and burdens of editorship, that Fuller and Dall were lied to, undercompensated, and, yet, remained committed to the written word.

“Resilience in Fuller’s Friendships with Arconati and Belgiojoso” by Patricia Richards

Patricia Lyn Richards earned her PhD in Italian literature from Rutgers University and has taught for several decades at Kenyon College in Ohio. Though her field was the Renaissance, she later moved into film, and recently discovered the intriguing complexity of the nineteenth century, while researching a paper on both the men and women Fuller was closest to in Italy.

Patricia spoke about friendship (in concept and in practice), focusing on Fuller’s friendships with two women in Italy. She detailed how these two women contemporaries offered Fuller examples of supportive friendships: they offered her solace, information, and the opportunity for action, giving reality to her philosophy of gender.

Tamara Rose (Left) with MFS Past President Phyllis Cole (Right), wearing the Thoreau Society Medal, at an MFS-sponsored dinner on July 11, 2024. Photo courtesy of Tamara Rose.

The panel was followed by a ceremony honoring MFS Past President Phyllis Cole, who was awarded the Thoreau Society Medal, the society’s highest honor, as well as a dinner at Fiorella’s Cucina organized by MFS Second Vice President Christina Katopodis.

Read the award statement here (opens in new tab).

Congratulations to MFS Past President, Phyllis Cole, Thoreau Society Medal Awardee

MFS Member Briggs Bailey (Left) stands next to MFS Past President Phyllis Cole (Right), wearing the Thoreau Society Medal at an MFS-sponsored dinner on July 11, 2023.

On July 11, 2024, at the 2024 Thoreau Society Annual Gathering, MFS Past President Phyllis Cole was awarded the Thoreau Society Medal, the society’s highest honor. MFS Second Vice President Christina Katopodis read a statement honoring Dr. Cole:

The Thoreau Society confers its highest honor, the Thoreau Society Medal, in recognition of “sustained, essential contributions to the legacy and vitality of Thoreauvian studies and ideals through extraordinary scholarship or service.” This year, we are delighted to extend this award to Dr. Phyllis Blum Cole.

Dr. Cole has had a distinguished career as a ground-breaking researcher, writer, editor, organizational leader, and professor. Her book, Mary Moody Emerson and the Origins of Transcendentalism: A Family History altered the landscape of Transcendentalism. In Bob Gross’s words, it is “a triumph of archival investigation” that “altered scholarship in several fields at once – Transcendentalism, New England’s religious and intellectual history, and women’s history.” Her discoveries in the archives reading Mary Moody’s “Almanacks” resulted in a book providing graceful translation of those works for a public audience and restored “Mary Moody Emerson “to the canon of the early republic.” Dr. Cole’s expert scholarship on women has shown us that, “In many ways Transcendentalism was a women’s world, both in the Thoreau household and in Concord and Boston” (Gross).

In awarding the Thoreau Society Medal to Dr. Cole, we celebrate not only the gifts she has brought us through her research and writing but also her trail-blazing leadership as a woman in academia. Her editorship, mentorship, and colleagueship—for example, her co-edited collection (with Jana Argersinger) Toward a Female Genealogy of Transcendentalism—has attracted the attention of early career women and gender nonconforming scholars, ringing a bell to announce that scholarship by women, and for women, and about women—including queer, trans, and nonbinary women—is not only welcomed but also essential to understanding Transcendentalism. Without Dr. Cole, I would not have seen a place for me here. It wasn’t until attending one of her panels at MLA in 2018, that I felt I had found my people, the people who make an academic life joyful and worth the struggle. Dr. Cole has served as President of the Ralph Waldo Emerson and Margaret Fuller Societies, as well as on the Board of Directors of the Thoreau Society, where she helped organize Annual Gatherings and guide the Society’s collections and fellowship awards. She has contributed to modernizing these important institutions through which we gather, learn, and commune.  

It is impossible to convey all the ways in which Dr. Cole is deserving of recognition and the many scholars and writers she has influenced, so I mention just a few. (And I’ve collected pages and pages more from your colleagues and friends who share a glittering of admiration, love, gratitude, and congratulations, that I will share with you after the gathering.) Megan Marshall writes of Phyllis’s [quote] “extraordinary skill and brilliance as a writer of scholarly prose . . . incomparable in her ability to write with both urgency and insight.” Noelle Baker emphasizes Dr. Cole’s influence as [quote] “a role model, a kind mentor and fierce advocate, a cherished friend, and invaluable colleague,” noting that her scholarship is [quote] “foundational to new feminist directions in several fields, including but not limited to transcendentalist studies, Emerson studies (now also populated by women, in large part inspired by her work), Margaret Fuller studies, Thoreau studies, and woman’s suffrage studies.” Finally, Jana Argersinger captures Dr. Cole’s openheartedness when she says, [quote] “Generosity is, for me, the shining through line in Phyllis’s way of walking through the world–generosity of heart and intellect for anyone who crosses her path.”

Dr. Cole, we thank you for your trail-blazing research and leadership, and your profound ability to build communities and connections that will sustain us for generations. You are both a pillar and a dear friend to the Thoreau Society, and we are honored to share this award with you.

MFS Members at dinner

Following the award ceremony, MFS members gathered for dinner at Fiorella’s Cucina held in honor of Dr. Cole.

“Refusing Foreclosures and Endings: 19C Women Writers’ Defiance, Persistence, and Resilience” MFS-organized Roundtable at C19 in Pasadena, CA

On March 14, 2024, we gather in Pasadena at the 2024 C19 Eighth Biennial Conference for a roundtable organized by the Margaret Fuller Society on “Refusing Foreclosures and Endings: 19C Women Writers’ Defiance, Persistence, and Resilience.” We have an impressive lineup of papers. Below you will find their titles, authors, and author bios.

“Margaret Fuller and the Ends of Immigrant Inclusion” by Leslie Eckel (Suffolk University)

“Feminist Kill(ed) Joys: Woman’s Health and Feminist Resistance in The Una (1853-55)” by Alice De Galzain (University of Sussex)

“Going Beyond: Cross-cultural Literary Adventure of Rebecca Rush and Lydia H. Sigourney” by Rowshan Chowdhury (University of Massachusetts, Amherst)

“Mirrored in Miranda: Margaret Fuller’s Intertextual Dialogues with Paternal Legacies and Male Discourses in ‘The Great Lawsuit'” by Manzar Feiz (University of Texas, Dallas)

“‘Still-Born Aspirations:’ Mothers of Stone in Elizabeth Stuart Phelps’s The Story of Avis” by Maddie Olley (Syracuse University)

“Defiant Friendship: Female Intersubjectivity in the 19th Century Asylum” by Elisabeth Harris (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill)

Author Bios

2025 MLA CFP: “Imperfect Women Writers” sponsored by the Margaret Fuller Society

“Imperfect Women Writers” sponsored by the Margaret Fuller Society

Modern Language Association 2025 | January 9–12, 2025, New Orleans

In Memoirs of Margaret Fuller Ossoli, the editors cite an anonymous correspondent of Fuller’s, who writes, “Margaret was one of the few persons who looked upon life as an art, and every person not merely as an artist, but as a work of art. She looked upon herself as a living statue, which should always stand on a polished pedestal, with right accessories, and under the most fitting lights. She would have been glad to have everybody so live and act. She was annoyed when they did not, and when they did not regard her from the point of view which alone did justice to her. No one could be more lenient in her judgments of those whom she saw to be living in this light. Their faults were to be held as ‘the disproportions of the ungrown giant.’ But the faults of persons who were unjustified by this ideal, were odious.”

Plenty of Fuller’s best and most sensitive readers would disagree with this appraisal. Still, it is useful for thinking about the ways readers and critics continue to render women writers works of art upon pedestals. How do we chip away at that penchant? What responsibilities do we have as critics to remove women writers from the pedestals predecessors or previous readers may have made?

How should we write and teach women writers in ways that document their flaws, failures, shadows, perceived imperfections, or positions on “wrong” sides of history?

How d0 women writers—and their readers—contend with criticism or with pressures not to speak up and out during their time?

How do censorship and/or recovery scholarship affect the ways we study women’s writing in our own difficult moment, especially amidst increasingly racist and misogynist currents within/against academia?

How should critics handle violence in nineteenth-century women’s views/voices and writing?

Submissions about Margaret Fuller are, of course, welcome, but proposals need not be limited to Fuller’s life or work. The Margaret Fuller Committee for Racial Justice encourages submissions to all panels to address anti-racist approaches to scholarship, pedagogy, and community engagement. Early career scholars are—as always—especially encouraged to apply.

Please send 250-word proposals or questions to Mollie Barnes at mbarnes2@uscb.edu with “MLA 2025 Proposal” in the subject line by March 22, 2024.

CFP for the 2024 American Literature Association (ALA) Conference

Margaret Fuller Society

American Literature Association 2024 Conference CFPs

Deadline Extended: January 22, 2024

Contact: argerj@gmail.com

The Margaret Fuller Society will sponsor two panels on relationality at the 35th Annual Conference of the American Literature Association, to be held 23–26 May 2024 at The Palmer House Hilton in Chicago. Please help circulate our CFPs far and wide across your circles of shared interest.

Send 250-word proposals (indicating AV needs) that respond to the calls below, along with brief biographical statements, to Jana Argersinger, 1st Vice President, at argerj@gmail.com. Submissions from graduate students and folks in non-academic fields are very welcome.

For conference details, go to http://americanliteratureassociation.org/ala- conferences/ala-annual-conference/. To learn more about the Fuller Society, visit https://margaretfullersociety.org/.

******************************************************************************

“Matters of belonging,” to quote two theorists of affect—matters of integration and dis-integration, to echo the founder of interpersonal neurobiology—run through all branches of relationship science, a discipline with “growing coherence and influence . . . on myriad scholarly fields” in both soft and hard sciences (Annual Review of Psychology, 2017). Belonging, being in secure relation, it seems increasingly clear, is at the core of human nature. And as the 2017 report points out, “poets, novelists, and philosophers have long recognized the centrality of relationships to human existence” (383), while scientists lag behind. According to Robin Wall Kimmerer, who dances gracefully across these disciplinary boundaries, “All of our flourishing is mutual” (Braiding Sweetgrass).

Both of our ALA panels will explore this topic in relation to Margaret Fuller and other women of the nineteenth century—the second panel focusing on pedagogy.

1) “Matters of Belonging” I: Relationality and Feeling in Fuller and Other 19C Women Writers and Reformers

Margaret Fuller, the much-acclaimed intellectual and supposed loner, lived and wrote throughout her years in the ambit of relationality and feeling. Her Autobiographical Romance constricts with complex grief in remembrance of her lost father and thrums with the travails of young friendship, the sting of alienation, the joys of attunement. Letters agonize over what she feels as her friend Emerson’s coldness and proclaim, “All the souls I ever loved are holy to me.” Beethoven’s Fifth Symphony speaks to her of the “tearful sweetness of the human heart.” The record of her Conversation series for women sets collaborative learning at its foundation. As a foreign correspondent and active witness to Italy’s Risorgimento, she sees “deeds of brotherhood” and a “spirit” that “cheers and animates” her own—in transatlantic relation to a “spoiled” US that may reawaken to its founding vision. And she writes, at length, with protective tenderness of her partner Giovanni Ossoli and their small son just months before drowning with them in shipwreck off Fire Island.

The Fuller Society invites ideas about these and other movements of relationality and feeling in the work of Fuller and other 19C women both within and beyond her cohort. Among an abundance of possibilities, papers could address the following:

  • Reciprocity, competition
  • Rupture, reconciliation
  • Family bonds, romantic partnership
  • Collaboration toward social justice
  • Indigenous experience
  • Lived experience of race, gender, economic condition
  • Applications of relationship science (attachment theory, interpersonal neurobiology, interdependence theory, affect theory, affection exchange theory)
  • Interpersonality in the process and products of writing
  • Collective experience of art, music, literature
  • Community storytelling
  • Autobiography in relation
  • Aesthetics/matters of form
  • Relationship with other-than-human beings
  • Health/well-being
  • Surprising/non-traditional kinships and alliances
  • Intellectual relation
  • Hierarchies, lateral relation
  • Varieties of feeling in relation:
    • feeling in common with others as fomenting collaboration/revolution
    • feeling the body-in-transcendence
    • feeling as fact/knowledge
    • affect (feeling before cognition)
    • feeling as in physical sensation
    • feeling and spirituality

2) “Matters of Belonging” II: Learning and Teaching in Relation—Fuller’s Conversations and Beyond

What do Fuller (in her Conversations, journalism, varied reform projects) and other women educators of her era suggest to us about modes of relationality and feeling in our efforts to teach and learn together, both inside and outside the classroom?

Potential points of contact:

  • Feeling as medium and/or content of learning
  • Building community in the learning environment
  • Learning collectively, challenging hierarchies
  • Conversation as an often-neglected learning outcome—and as urgent civic education
  • Perspective of grad student teachers
  • Public humanities
  • Social justice pedagogy
  • Restorative justice practices, including circle work
  • Community engagement and service learning
  • Learning venues outside the traditional classroom (for example: prisons, websites, museums, nature centers)
  • Marginalized populations reclaiming their stories
  • Mentoring
  • Autobiographical elements
  • Role of technology
  • Fertile challenges and problems